Draft Registration for Women?

What happened to men and women being legally equal and all that talk?  I guess all I can say at this point is that I'm not surprised.  I'm pretty sure that legal equality would probably require the same amount of responsibility/duty to country, I don't know......equally?  And feminists wonder why men don't take them seriously.

The Good Mangina Project

Bernard Chapin has a really great youtube channel.  Even though I'm an Independent and think the Right is just as useless/idiotic as the Left most of the time, I still agree with most of what he says whenever he's not talking about politics.




Take a look from the 'goodmenproject.com' website: http://goodmenproject.com/

It's supposed to be about men and maculinity but it's flooded and filled with homosexual bullshit and mangina ideology.  They honestly expect men to buy into this crap?  Good luck with that.

These 'men' are nothing but male feminists (aka gay rights activists with an agenda) that want to improve relations with the 90%+ heterosexual world community like the LGBT gay-straight alliance douches.

It's like these people live in an alternate reality.  Men (the world majority of them being straight) bond by discussing common interests (ie., women, sports, video games, hobbies, etc.) in a manner that they feel comfortable with as heterosexuals which involves heteronormativity.  Most men cannot and don't want to waste time with homosexuals, transsexuals, bisexuals, lesbians, etc. since there will always be a conflict of interest in life and usually a conflict of morals.

This is ridiculous.  I have a gay Uncle and though he is a family member, I don't like spending time with him because he is truly a weirdo.  Myself and other people in our family can't relate to the guy and we are nice to him (not just 'tolerant') but there isn't any way we can be around the guy longer than a few hours at most.  We have different senses of humors, different ways we view things of interests (we see a 'cool' action hero, he sees a 'handsome man' kind of thing) and not to mention the guys like talking about women sensually and sexually but he likes to talk about men that way.  There is no way in hell straight men want anything to do with that. Period.

What's funny is that these people want to say that there is equality if they 'force' everyone to want to get involved with people that spread diseases like HIV, HPV, etc. but you're a 'homophobe' if you don't want to be around them even though some of the diseases being spread around are contagious and can be passed around by physical contact with them.  Go figure.

I can't wait until one of the 'straight' men in these 'groups' actually contracts one of these diseases/viruses and starts sueing.  Not only will stigma force these deginerates to leave people alone, it will cause a social backlash that is backed by health concerns as it should be in the first place.

Of course, not all LGBT-ers are deginerates.  I save that name for those in the LGBT crowd that feel they are so special that they can force everyone to care about their own movement at the expense of everyone elses social/political/medical/psychological/economic problems.

Putting MRAs on the Down-Low

This is one of his best posts on youtube yet.

Dave Sim. On The Female Emotional Void

A nice video of KellyJones00 from youtube about the Female Emotional Void.




A wonderful point of view why most men are smart enough to not get into arguments with women.  You can't get into an emotional/opinionated argument and expect to find a solution based on fact and/or logic.

The APA (American Psychiatric Association) has been losing credibility for some time now

First, from: http://vox-nova.com/2008/02/17/the-apa-and-homosexuality/ by Blackadder on Feb 17, 2008.

'
Via Kathy Shaidle, Sally Satel’s review of The Loss of Sadness: How Psychiatry Transformed Normal Sorrow Into Depressive Disorder contains an interesting tidbit about the APA’s decision to eliminate homosexuality from its official list of mental disorders:

In the early 1970s, annual meetings of the American Psychiatric Association (APA) were home to angry showdowns between the gay rights lobby and organized psychiatry. Activists picketed convention sites, shouted down speakers, and waged ad hominem attacks on psychiatrists who sincerely believed that homosexuality was a sickness. The goal of their flamboyant campaign against the APA — an impressive display of “guerrilla theater,” as one psychiatrist put it — was to force the association to take homosexuality out of its official handbook, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, second edition, popularly known as the DSM-II.
In December 1973, they won. A decisive majority of the APA board of trustees voted to remove homosexuality from the professional nomenclature.”Doctors Rule Homosexuals Not Abnormal,” read the headline in the next day’s Washington Post. It was a major victory both for gay people and for the enlightened wing of the psychiatric establishment. But rather than calm the critics of psychiatry, the APA’s acknowledgment that homosexuality was not a mental illness only inflamed them. They took this as further evidence that the profession was a sham, and asked in outrage how psychiatry could claim to be a legitimate, scientific branch of medicine if its members determined the very existence of an illness by vote.

More. The APA changes its position on homosexuality after protest and harassment and people lose faith in the authority of its pronouncements? Go figure. It’s worth noting, though, that the conduct members of the APA were subjected to by those gay activists is just an extreme example of the social pressures scientists, academics, and other professionals are subjected to generally to conform their conclusions to the opinions of their social group. A researcher whose work tends towards some politically unpalatable conclusions is not likely to have people picketing his house, but he is likely to face a subtle ostracism from his friends and colleagues.
Exactly how much this tends to skew their work in the face of such pressure cannot be known (any more than we can know what the results of the APA vote on homosexuality would have been without the “guerilla theater” of the gay activists). But it is certainly a bias that must be taken into account. '


Secondly, we have: http://www.dadi.org/eg_apa.htm (Dads Against the Divorce Industry) by Evan Gahr.

' 
CONGRESS NOW HAS yet another reason to berate the American Psychological Association.
The APA this fall officially brushed off congressional criticism of its notorious "study" that called fathers worse than useless. That study came to light earlier this year, not long after a congressional furor broke out over an APA article that appeared to condone pedophilia.
Still, congressmen remain oblivious to how they can really make the APA squirm: Hit the District-based organization in the pocketbook. Last year, unbeknownst to its congressional critics, the APA received millions of dollars in federal subsidies, the American Spectator discloses. There's plenty more where that comes from; most of the grants are multiyear.
Why aren't congressmen a bit more attuned to how they spend taxpayer dollars? After all, it just took them several weeks after the Brooklyn Museum controversy broke to realize that the federal government underwrites the now notorious arts institution (which is locked in a battle with New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani over an exhibition that features a dung-splattered Virgin Mary portrait).
As for the APA, an ostensibly scientific organization that functions as a left-liberal advocacy group (witness their new alliance with the American Federation of Teachers), it's almost comical that congressmen unwittingly fund the very organization they condemn.
Some background: In July 1998, the APA's Psychological Bulletin published an article that seemed to condone pedophilia. "A Meta-Analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples" argued that the "negative potential" of sexual abuse has "been overstated." Child sex abuse, they contended, actually encompasses a wide range of behavior best described with "value neutral" terms.
You might think that would raise eyebrows among the "scientific community." But the article went practically unnoticed until "Dr. Laura" Schlessinger attacked it on her nationally syndicated radio show March 22. The press took note. And soon Congress was turning up the screws on the APA, or so it seemed.
On May 12, House Majority Whip Tom DeLay of Texas and three other GOP congressman held a press conference to denounce the APA. Rep. Matt Salmon, Arizona Republican, lamented that "we have a so-called credible psychological organization in this country that purports to say that maybe sex with children isn't bad."
Unbeknownst to the congressmen , this "so-called credible psychological association" has long been in bed with the federal government. The APA has long enjoyed a small but steady flow of federal dollars. And last year, the APA was awarded $4.78 million in federal grants, most of them multiyear. Nor is this anything new. The National Institutes of Health, for example, have funded the APA since at least the late 1980s.
Yes, the government grants represent a small fraction of the APA's $77.63 million annual budget And it's true that some of the grants, such as $848,000 last year to train minority scientists, sound innocuous. But money is fungible. Money earmarked for seemingly legitimate purposes frees up funds to support pro-pedophilia articles.
In any event, shouldn't all these government ties makes the APA awfully scared to antagonize Congress? Apparently not. In the face of criticism over the pedophilia article, the APA simply hid behind science. A spokeswoman said "I think the issue is not so much about pedophilia but whether science should be allowed to ask tough questions."
However, as congressional pressure mounted the APA finally backed down just a bit. CEO Ray Fowler told Mr. DeLay that there were inconsistencies in the APA study. He promised a full review and insisted the APA in no way condones child sex abuse.
Just when the pedophilia controversy was subsiding, a new one erupted. In June 1999, the American Psychologist, which all APA members receive, published "Deconstructing the Essential Father." The authors attacked "neo-conservatives" for their claim that fathers are crucial to a child's development. Psychologists Carl Auerbach and Louise Silverstein explained that sometimes life without father is best. After all, Dad may may squander the household money by gambling or buying alcohol or cigarettes.
It was deja vu all over again. Columnists screamed. Rep. Joseph Pitts, Pennsylvania Republican, and other congressmen complained to Mr. Fowler in an Aug. 6 letter.
If the APA was weary from all the criticism, it sure wasn't evident at their annual convention later that month. The controversies were largely ignored. And the convention, with a seemingly endless parade of left-wing speakers, could have been mistaken for a meeting of Jesse Jackson's Rainbow Coalition.
In fact, Jesse Jackson was the keynote speaker. He brought the APA crowd to its feet as he railed against the "jail industrial complex," demanded "universal health care," denounced U.S. imperialism, trashed George W. Bush and Ronald Reagan. (Another speaker attacked Clarence Thomas.)
On and on it went. Still, the convention's sensibility shouldn't have surprised anyone. The APA has long pushed an unabashedly left-liberal agenda. In addition to such standard liberal goodies as unrestricted abortion rights, gay rights and stringent "affirmative action" measures.
Moreover, key elements of the mental health profession have long manifested utter contempt for middle-class values. In the 1960s and 1970s, one shrink even made his name blaming schizophrenia on society. On the political front, they have declared Barry Goldwater psychologically unfit to be president. And this month, the APA's New York division joined the left-leaning teachers union. (Other state APA divisions may soon join the AFT.)
It's well to note that when the American Medical Association condemned partial-birth abortion in 1996 liberals yelped that politics had tainted medicine. But when the APA shills for the left - and even assorted perverts - it's a different story. Object and you're thwarting scientific progress.
Just look how the APA finally answered criticism of the organization's anti-fatherhood screed. In a Sept. 20 letter to Mr. Pitts, Mr. Fowler, the APA honcho, said APA articles are meant to engender scientific discussion. Actually, with their sniping at the neo-conservatives, the authors of the article sounded more like "Crossfire" panelists than dispassionate scientists. (Even the article's title's reference to "deconstructing" reeks of academia).
Mr. Fowler did not return a phone call for this article. And APA President Richard Suinn cut off questions about the APA as "inappropriate."
But if congressional Republicans ever get serious about their threat to "defund the left," the APA is a great place to start.  '


Third, we have http://encognitive.com/node/1215.  The 'Misdiagnosing Mental Illness' article is what I looked at, only after reading through many others.

' 

Misdiagnosing Mental Illness

By Nicholas Regush.
Some So-Called "Psychiatric Diseases" May Not Have A Biological Basis, So Do Drugs Really Help?
[Commentary By Nicholas Regush.]
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/living/SecondOpinion/secondopinion.html
Psychiatry has become a heavily drug-company influenced edifice which often trumpets highly speculative biological science. There are signs many Americans are disturbed by the insidious evolution of psychiatry as a shill for pharmaceuticals and a tool for behavior control
Two class-action lawsuits filed last month allege the American Psychiatric Association and Ritalin's maker, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corp (formed through the merger of Ciba-Geigy and Sandoz) encouraged over-diagnosis of behavioral disorders in children Congress also recently convened hearings about whether Ritalin is over-prescribed to children who are diagnosed as having Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).
Is It Intrinsic or Culture? These are children who purportedly have disorder-related symptoms such as short attention span, impulsive behavior and restlessness. Some undoubtedly have these difficulties and need some help, but these days it would appear that when a child too often twitches in school, cracks a few jokes, or gazes off, bored stiff, he or she can be slapped with an ADHD label. This "diagnostic" enthusiasm has gone way off the deep end. Now, finally, there are serious calls to investigate.
Part of the problem lies in psychiatry's disorder classification system. I'm referring here to the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, or DSM. It is at the core of modern-day psychiatric practice and influences how the entire field of mental health deals with patients and research.
Fidgeting Is a Sign of Illness
The latest DSM edition's description of ADHD is truly something to behold. In the inattention category, for example, one symptom is "Has difficulty sustaining attention." Another is: "Does not appear to listen."
One symptom in the hyperactive/impulsive category is: "Fidgets with hands or feet or squirms in chair." Another is: "Blurts out answers before questions have been completed."
If these types of symptoms occur frequently and appear to be severe, then the child has a good chance of being branded ADHD
The problem is, some of the symptoms listed could point to a wide variety of stimuli: Insufferably boring teachers. An out-of touch-with-reality academic curriculum. This is, after all, the Internet Age in which the flow of ideas and facts are fast and furious. And what about learning patterns at home that might play a role in how a child behaves at school?
To give so many children a drug such as Ritalin presupposes that specific biological problems underlie ADHD. And in psychiatry, this gets about as murky as you can possibly imagine.
The recent orgy of drug-giving to so-called ADHD children is no historical accident. It comes at a time when there is increasing pressure within psychiatry to focus more attention in the DSM on biological causes of disease.
Biology vs. Psychological Causes
Much of the history of psychiatry boils down to a duel between those who have attempted to relate mental disorders to specific brain functions (the biological approach) and those who have attempted to explain disorders in psychological terms (the mind approach).
As long as biological psychiatry had few treatments to bank on, psychology more or less held sway. But that changed considerably in the 1970s when moderately effective treatments for mental illness appeared on the market. That gave biological psychiatry a huge shot in the arm and it has grown in stature and power ever since.
But here's the rub. The brain has proved to be far more vastly complex than some of the biological enthusiasts have imagined. To be sure, there has been progress, but much of what is considered mental illness still is poorly understood and many drugs offer scattershot rather than well-targeted treatment. And that often translates into patients suffering serious drug side effects.
It is indeed very telling that psychiatry's disorder classification system, the DSM, still remains, as the section on ADHD shows - primarily a manual of descriptions of psychological states and symptoms - and not a manual pointing to disorders with specific underlying biological conditions.
Assumed ADHD Is Biologically Caused
Yet, in the case of ADHD, for example, there is clearly an unstated assumption that symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity have some biological cause. But the behavior that is described may have non-biological or social causes, such as bad parenting, poor schools and poverty.
There is certainly no indication in the DSM's description of ADHD that the "disorder" can be viewed as arising from a difficult or non-conformist relationship between an individual and his culture.
In other words, rather than spotlight problems in the culture, the subtle message in the DSM is that ADHD is biological in origin and therefore mental health professionals should opt for drugs to quell some ill-defined inner disruption
There is little in the way of worthy biological data available on something termed "ADHD" to make a scientific case for so much drugging of children.
Now, if either the current president of the American Psychiatric Association or the chief science officer of Novartis would enjoy debating me on this point, I'm sure we can arrange a public forum and an Internet Webcast.  '


I think after reading several other articles that we need to defund the APA greatly and ensure that there is a more 'diverse' group of people conducting surveys, looking at data and overall oversight within this unique 'Scientific' arena.  Over the past 30 years or so, I think parents should take a hard look at who is doing what and how it is affecting our families.

An interesting radical feminist blog

I stumbled upon this website today:

http://allecto.wordpress.com/2009/03/12/where-are-all-the-younger-lesbian-feministsseparatists/

This blog appears to be a radical, lesbian blog that wants to reinvigorate radical 'seperatist feminism'.

I bet this blog is just a haven of fun.

Legal influence of Misandry and Pseudoscience

This is nothing more than a symptom of the Feminist ideologues-



I do hope that you remember that the destruction of the family is one of the stated goals of the Lesbian Feminist Matriarchs.

Interesting blog I found that genuinely supports father’s rights

 Interesting blog I found at:

 http://fathersrightshelp.blogspot.com/2011/02/recent-court-ruling-denies-viable.html

posted by fathershelphotline

‘Saturday, February 12, 2011

Recent Court Ruling Denies Viable Father for Rights and Forces Child into Adoption

Imagine--you're seventeen, hold down a part-time job, and are successful in school. You're on the school's football team, baseball team, and have no criminal history or history of drug use or alcohol use. Your girlfriend gets pregnant, tells you you're the father, and you prepare accordingly to have the child raised and cared for in your home by your mother while you're in school. The crib is assembled and the nursery is complete, a whole separate room in your parents' home for your new arrival.
Delivery day comes. The mother of your child refuses you as the father and puts the child up for adoption.
Like most dads (regardless of age), you would go through the courts to fight for the rights to be the parent to your child--even if your girlfriend (or perhaps "ex-girlfriend" at this point) feels the child should be put in adoptive care. Would you succeed?
Apparently not. In a recent court ruling in Bakersfield, California, a 17-year-old father, Christian Diaz, was denied parental rights to his own child, forcing the baby into adoptive care. A willing father was denied the chance to raise his child, just because the child's mother made a decision on her own, left his name off of the birth certificate, and persuaded hospital authorities that he wasn't the father and to keep him away from the child.
Father's rights are necessary. Cases like this, where a fit and willing father is stepping up to the plate to be a dad, remind us that there is still a long road ahead of us. Being with our children and raising them is a right we have, and until the courts can see this, we will continue to fight for our rights!
Read more about this hearing on Bakersfield.com.
Become a fan of the National Brotherhood of Fathers Rights on Facebook to be updated with new articles and news stories as they happen!
Posted by fathershelphotline at 2:31 PM’


This is sad but a real eye opener and blogs like this will help show the world what injustices are being done to fathers, in all aspects and facets of modern life.  Keep up the good work and thank you so much for helping to share this story to the world.

Jūsų suvokimas yra jūsų realybe

Gana Frickin kietas (tai yra homoseksualus registravimo Juslinė medžiagos iš numanomus MRM svetainės balso vyrams)

Iš http://www.avoiceformen.com/2011/04/09/pretty-frickin-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-29462

pagal BR Merrick 4, 9, 2011 m.

"Man patinka vaikščioti žemyn kalno į patogumui parduotuvė galbūt porą kartų per savaitę. Aš gyvenu didelis-bet-malonus Butas kompleksas, kinda iš boonies. Taigi aš klausytis Prokofjevas 's "vasaros naktis" Suite mano iPod ir žengti mini-mall, kai aš galimybę į aukštas, platus c.i.f., Przystojny juodas vyrukas, tikriausiai apie 10 metų jaunesnis nei I, raumenų Prigludęs juoda tee marškinėliai ir Kamufliažinis šortai, laikydami rankas cutest berniukas, jūs matė nuo šį vieną. Maža, mažas berniukas pants. Džinsus su Nr nugarą kišenės. (Tais atvejais, kai nėra jis įdėti savo berniukas piniginės?) Džinsus yra taip Maisveidīgs, atrodo, kad jis nėra užpakalis.

Aš perduoti juos ir stebėjo, ir stebėjo, ir stebėjo su didelis šypsnys į mano veidą.
Kai buvo vadovauja atgal namo, jie vis dar kelyje į mane. Aš labai norėjau paklausti jo, ar galėtų būti paveikslėlį, greitai interviu jis išsiaiškinti, kas/kas/jei/kai/kodėl/kaip. Aš norėjau pasidalinti šiek tiek daugiau apie tai, kaip aš dalytis. Bet aš džiaugiuosi, aš nusprendžiau prieš tai. Nėra ką pasakyti apie haiku, nors tai skamba daugiau graudus anglų kalba:

Tėvas ir sūnus
Ėjimas koja kojon be
Mano trukdžių.

Todėl aš susilaikyti nuo paminėti pièce de résistance , kai jis iškedentas kad vaikas iš savo pusės liemens ir pateikti jį per savo pečių.

BR Merrick rašo "streikuoti šaknis" ir "A balso vyrams," gyvenimą į šiaurės rytus, didžiuojasi būti klasikinės muzikos redaktoriaus Amazon.com ir iTunes ir nepaisant visų nuodingas televizijos pobūdį, Dievas pats turės smalsauti savo DVD iš "Monty Python plaukioja cirko" iš savo šaldymo, mirę rankas, iškilusi grėsmė amžinai nuteistųjų. "



Komentarų apie šį puslapį ir greitai suprato, šis vaikinas tikrai gali būti vyrų teises, bet tai nėra minios, kad dauguma tiesiai vyrams būtų rimtai tipo. Aš nieko prieš LGBT minios, bet kodėl ten būti nieko nuotoliniu būdu Juslinė į svetainę kaip tai? Nėra jokių įtikinančių argumentų, kad esu susipažinęs patvirtinti jo galiojimas, supratau, kaip malė pagal "feministė judėjimas", kad yra malė orientuotas ir viršijimas su homoseksualų ideologσw, kad bus, žinoma, ne suma daug ilgainiui ir greičiausiai sukelti daugiau žalos nei gerai, kad heterosexuals, kad būtų tikrai looking for a palanki grupė žmonių. Garso susipažinę?

Aš sąžiningai negalėjo rūpintis mažiau ką nors daro savo miegamasis. Bet kaip gali kas nors imtis jūs rimtai, kai yra pranešimų patiko, kad jūsų svetainėje? Kurie leistų svetainės kad "remia" [įveskite lyties] teises, apie priešingą lytį kalbama (kai kuriais atvejais gali būti galiojantis atsižvelgiant į ypač rodinys), tada leidžia tie patys žmonės grupėje rašyti sexualized ir sensualized straipsnių apie tą pačią grupę žmonių? Ak, feminists. Ji tik daro tiek daug prasmės. Įvesti vyriškos lyties feminazi metus.

Žinoma, leidžia ne sutelkti dėmesį visų blogų dalykų, kurie vyksta ten, nes neblogai turi potencialą, kad žemės. Kaip feminists, jie advokatas jų lyčių teisių kartais pasakyti mažiau kaip geros reputacijos dalykų apie priešingą lytį, eiti į isterija kiekvieną kartą, kai kažkas klausimų tam tikromis temomis, imtis ką nors pasakyti iš konteksto ir, žinoma rezultatas pavadinimas telefonu be priežasties ne visi (taip patBe ne susitarti su jais visiškai).

Paklaustas, paprastą klausimą "kaip malė, tiesiai paauglys manote?", kad gali atsitikti, per šį puslapį ji buvo susitiko su sieros rūgštis, ad hominem išpuolių ir tipiškų feministė purvo pakabinamieji kaip įprasta. Ji neatsižvelgė ilgas man sugauti vėjo, kas iš tiesų vyksta. Jie buvo gynybinės be priežasties. Jie buvo daugiau kaip reaguoja į paprastą klausimą "Kaip svarbi šį pranešimą vyrų teises?" Ji neatsižvelgia į genijus, suprantame, kad jie buvo yra per apsaugos kažką, kad nebuvo net ataka į pirmąją vietą.

Visais sąžiningumo, gavo paprastas atsakymas, mes parama homoseksualai, registravimo Juslinė straipsnių apie kiti žmonės sakė "gerai" ir būtų neišeisite etape teisę. Tačiau reakcija, kad gavau man galvoti, kad būtų klijuoti per purvo pakabinamieji ir ji neatsiώvelgλ daug man pamatyti, ką jie apie.

Tai ne pirmą kartą Pauliaus grupės atėjo į klausimą apie tai vientisumą. Dėl to dėstydamos buvo ataskaitas rasinės slurs, pavadinimas telefonu, išgedinimas taktiką ir t.t. (jūs žinote, visiškai feministė dalykas) ir jis padarė daug MRMs give up apie juos. Jų taip pat yra nuorodos į pro "White nacionalistinė" svetainėse kaip http://www.inmalafide.com/ , taip pat yra anti-feminist arba pro APS bet sąžiningai, gali rimtai galima jums grupė su peržiūros patinka, kad? Na, manau, mangina gali būti įvairių formų ir formų. Kai aš sakau mangina, šiuo atveju, I mean vyrai, kad yra toks silpnas, kad jie turi grupė iki kitiems nereikalingų emocinę paramą poreikį. Kaip padaryti feminists. Tai liūdna diena.

Žmogus gali būti reikalaujama apmokėti seksualinis priekabiavimas, "leering" į moterį darbo vietoje bet homoseksualų žmogus gali rašyti Juslinė straipsnius vyrų teisių svetainėje, kad čempionų "Vyrų ir berniukų" tais atvejais, kai bet koks berniukas gali būti Banglentės tai puslapių ieško atsakymus, tik prie pamatyti kažką panašaus. Kai aš paklausė apie komentarą, kad jis padarė nurodant "vyrų yra sveikintinas čia be kvalifikacijos" aš paminėti, kad galbūt jis negali būti gera idėja nes jis gali pritraukti pedos arba nariai iš NAMBLA klika, dar kartą, konstruktyvios kritikos buvo susitiko su gynybinės spaudimas ir sieros rūgštis.

Galiausiai, kad sakė, aš suprantu, kaip sunku gali būti, kad daug atskirų veidus ir matmenų žmonių iš įvairių sluoksnių, įsitikinimus, seksualinė orientacija, ir tt ir po vienu stogu. Paul, pats, nėra daugiau nei jo tikroji dalis, ką jis daro ir kelia daug savo laiko (ir išteklius iš ką galite surinkti) į šį projektą. Jei jis gali gauti savo over-reactive, hiper gynybinės lackeys augti poros ir savo gyvenimą be gyvenimo vicariously per ką tik galima apibūdinti kaip Okaleczenie spaudimas kaip stiprus, vyriškas, vyriškumas, tada galbūt daugiau vyrų būtų pamatyti grupės yra atviros, teigiama.

Dauguma vyrų (arba moterų, kad norėsite padėti) bus ne suderinti save su grupe whiners, kaip feministė kariuomenę. Kaip ir dauguma mano kartos žmonių, kad prieštarauti juokingumas, seeping į mūsų norimą tarpų awesomeness pasakyti, "sėkmės su".

La percezione è la vostra realtà

Pretty cool Frickin (questo è un omosessuale, la pubblicazione di materiale sensuale da un presunto sito MRM una voce per gli uomini)

Da http://www.avoiceformen.com/2011/04/09/pretty-frickin-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-29462

da B.R. Merrick 4/09/2011

' Mi piace passeggiare giù per la collina per il deposito di convenienza forse un paio di volte a settimana. Io vivo in un appartamento grande piacevole ma complesso, kinda fuori in boonies. Così sto ascoltando Suite "notte d'estate" di Prokofiev sul mio iPod e striding la mini-mall, quando possibilità su di un alto, spalle larghe, bel ragazzo nero, probabilmente circa 10 anni più giovane di I, aggrappato muscolo maglietta nera e pantaloncini camuffamento, tiene per mano il ragazzo più teneri piccolo che hai visto fin dal primo questo. Pantaloni minuscoli, little boy. Jeans con nessun tasche posteriori. (Dove mise suo portafoglio ragazzino?) I jeans sono così larghi che sembra che egli non ha nessun culo.

Li passavano e guardato e guardato e guardato con un grande sorriso sul mio volto.
Quando ero capo torna a casa, erano ancora sulla strada davanti a me. Ho voluto disperatamente per chiedergli se ho potuto prendere una foto, rapidamente intervistarlo per scoprire chi/cosa/dove/quando/motivo/come. Volevo condividere un po ' più di esso che sto condividendo. Ma io sono contento che ho deciso contro di esso. C'è qualcosa da dire per l'haiku, anche se suona più pietoso in inglese:

Un padre e un figlio
Camminare mano nella mano, senza
Mio interferenze.

Pertanto, mi asterrò dal menzionare la pièce de résistance quando tirò fuori il ragazzo dal suo fianco dal tronco e lo pose fino sopra le spalle.

B.R. Merrick scrive per "Strike la radice" e "A Voice per gli uomini," vive nel nord-est, è orgogliosa di essere un recensore di musica classica presso Amazon.com e iTunes, e a dispetto di natura velenosa della televisione, Dio stesso dovrà fare leva suo DVD di "Monty Python Flying Circus" fuori del suo freddo, le mani di morti, sotto la minaccia di dannazione eterna. "



Ho commentato questa pagina e subito capito questo ragazzo può essere veramente per i diritti dell'uomo, ma questo non è il tipo di folla che la maggior parte uomini eterosessuali avrebbe preso sul serio. Non ho nulla contro la folla LGBT, ma quale motivo ci sarebbe nulla di lontanamente sensuale su un sito come questo? Non c'è alcun argomento convincente che sono a conoscenza di confermare la sua validità, così ho capito come un maschio basa 'movimento femminista' che è maschio-centrica e invasa da ideologi omosessuale che, ovviamente, non la quantità di molto a lungo termine e molto probabilmente causare più male che bene per gli eterosessuali che sarebbero veramente essere cercate un appoggio gruppo di persone. Suona familiare?

Onestamente non potevo cura meno ciò che qualcuno fa nella loro camera da letto. Ma come potrebbe qualcuno prendono sul serio quando ci sono messaggi simile nel tuo sito? Che renderebbe un sito che supporta' ' [invio sesso] di diritti, parla del sesso opposto (in alcuni casi può essere valido a seconda di un particolare vista), poi permette di quelle stesse persone all'interno del gruppo di scrivere articoli sessualizzati e sensualized su quel stesso gruppo di persone? Ah, le femministe. Ha senso solo così tanto. Inserisci l'anno di feminazi maschile.

Naturalmente, non concentriamoci su tutte le cose cattive che va lì, dal momento che la roba buona ha la potenzialità di rendere la terra. Come femministe, l'avvocato per i diritti del loro genere, a volte dire meno rispettabili cose di sesso opposto, andare in isteria, ogni volta che qualcuno domande determinati argomenti, prendere niente che dici fuori dal contesto e ovviamente risultato alla chiamata per nessuna ragione a tutti (anche il nomeoltre a non d'accordo con loro, completamente).

Quando ha chiesto una semplice questione di 'come un adolescente maschio, dritto sentireste?' che possa accadere attraverso questa pagina si era incontrato con vetriolo, ad hominem attacchi e tipico femminista fango imbracatura come al solito. Non ci volle lungo per me, per catturare il vento di ciò che stava succedendo veramente. Erano sulla difensiva per nessun motivo. Essi sono stati oltre reagire a una semplice domanda "Come è questo post rilevanti per i diritti dell'uomo?" Non ci vuole un genio per rendersi conto che essi erano stati sopra protettivo di qualcosa che non era ancora sotto attacco in primo luogo.

In tutta onestà, avevo ricevuto una risposta semplice 'sosteniamo gli omosessuali distacco sensuali articoli su altri uomini' mi avrebbe detto 'va bene' e avrebbe sono usciti in destra di fase. Ma la reazione che ho ricevuto mi ha fatto pensare che sarebbe restare attraverso il fango imbracatura e non ci volle molto per me vedere quello che sono tutti.

Questa non è la prima volta il gruppo di Paul è giunto in dubbio circa la sua integrità. Sulla punta di diamante ci sono state segnalazioni di insulti razziali, chiamando il nome, svergognare tattiche, ecc (si sa, la cosa intera femminista) e ha fatto un sacco di MRMs rinunciare su di loro. Loro è anche collegamenti a siti pro 'bianca nazionalista' come http://www.inmalafide.com/ che sono anche anti-femminista o pro MRA, ma onestamente, can can gravi si prende un gruppo con viste come quello? Beh, credo che mangina può venire in molte forme. Quando dico mangina, in questo caso, voglio dire la necessità degli uomini che sembrano essere così debole che hanno bisogno di gruppo su altri per inutile supporto emotivo. Proprio come quello che fanno le femministe. È un giorno triste.

Un uomo può essere addebitato per molestie sessuali per 'malizie' una donna sul posto di lavoro, ma un uomo omosessuale può scrivere articoli sensuali su diritti sito un uomo che campioni 'Uomini e ragazzi' dove ogni ragazzo può navigare pagine alla ricerca di risposte, solo per vedere qualcosa di simile. Quando ho chiesto un commento che ha fatto affermando che «gli uomini sono i benvenuti qui senza qualificazione» menzionato che forse potrebbe non essere una buona idea poiché esso può attirare pedos o membri dalla cricca del NAMBLA, ancora una volta, la critica costruttiva è stata accolta con atteggiamenti difensiva e di vetriolo.

Infine, detto questo, mi rendo conto quanto può essere difficile avere molte facce individuali e le dimensioni di persone provenienti da diversi background, credenze, preferenze sessuali, ecc sotto lo stesso tetto. Paul, se stesso, fa più di sua quota equa con quello che fa e mette molto del suo tempo (e le risorse da che cosa posso si riuniscono) in questo progetto. Se egli può ottenere la sua over-reactive, iper-difensiva lacchè a crescere un paio e hanno le loro vite senza vivere indirettamente attraverso ciò che può essere descritto soltanto come zoppia atteggiarsi come mascolinità forte, virile, allora forse più uomini vedrebbe il gruppo come un'aperta, forza positiva.

La maggior parte uomini (o donne che potrebbero voler aiutare) saranno non allinearsi con un gruppo di piagnoni, come la truppa femminista. Come con la maggior parte delle persone della mia generazione che si oppongono ridicolo filtrazione in nostri spazi desiderate della suggestione dire, 'buona fortuna con quello'.

Din uppfattning är din verklighet

Vackra Frickin cool (detta är homosexuell bokföra sinnliga materialet från en förmodad MRM webbplats en röst för män)

Från http://www.avoiceformen.com/2011/04/09/pretty-frickin-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-29462

av b. r. Merrick 4/9/2011

"Jag vilja gå ner kullen till bekvämlighet store kanske ett par gånger i veckan. Jag bor i en komplex, kinda ut i boonies stora-men-trevlig lägenhet. Så jag lyssnar på Prokofiev's "Sommarnatt" Suite på min iPod och kämpa mini-mall, när jag chans på en lång, bred-tagit, snygg svart kille, troligen omkring 10 år yngre än jag, muskel-fast svart tee skjorta och kamouflage kortfilmer, hålla handen på den sötaste lilla pojken som du har sett sedan här. Liten, liten pojke byxor. Jeans med ingen bakfickor. (Där han lagt sin lilla pojken plånbok?) Jeansen är så baggy ser det ut som han har ingen rumpa.

Jag gått dem och tittade, och tittade, och tittade med ett stort grin på mitt ansikte.
När jag var ledde tillbaka hem, var de fortfarande på banan i mig. Jag desperat ville be honom om jag kunde ta en bild, snabbt intervjua honom att ta reda på vem/vad/var/när/varför/hur. Jag ville dela lite mer av detta än jag delar. Men jag är glad att jag bestämde mig emot. Det finns något att sägas om haiku, även om det låter mer beklagansvärd på engelska:

En far och son
Gå hand i hand utan
Min inblandning.

Jag avstår därför från nämna pièce de résistance när han dras på kid från sin sida av överkropp och placerade honom upp över axlarna.

B. r. Merrick skriver för "slå rot" och "A Voice för män," liv i nordöst, är stolt över att vara en klassisk musik granskare på Amazon.com och iTunes och i trots av giftiga av TV, kommer Gud själv har måste få bort sin DVD-skivor av "Monty Pythons flygande cirkus" av hans kalla, döda händer, under hot om evig fördömelse. "



Jag kommenterade på den här sidan och insåg snabbt den här killen kanske verkligen för mäns rättigheter men det inte är typ av folkmassan som de flesta straight män skulle ta på allvar. Jag har ingenting emot HBT publiken men varför skulle det vara allt fjärrstyra sensuell på en webbplats som denna? Det finns inte några övertygande argument som jag är medveten om att bekräfta dess giltighet så jag förstod det som en hane baserade "feministiska rörelsen" som är hanen sidcentrerade och överskridande med homosexuella ideologer som kommer naturligtvis, motsvarar inte mycket på lång sikt och troligtvis leda till mer skada än nytta för heterosexuella som verkligen skulle ute efter en stödjande grupp av människor. Låter det bekant?

Jag ärligt talat inte kunde bryr vad någon gör i deras sovrum. Men hur kan någon tar på allvar när det finns tjänster som i din webbplats? Som skulle göra en webbplats som "stöder" [Ange kön] rättigheter, talar motsatt kön (i vissa fall kan vara giltigt beroende på en viss vy), sedan gör samma människor inom gruppen skriva sexualized och sensualized artiklar om att samma grupp av människor? Ah, feminister. Det är bara så mycket meningsfullt. Ange år då de manliga Feminazism.

Naturligtvis ska vi inte inriktas på alla de dåliga saker som går där, eftersom bra grejer har potential att göra marken. Som feminister, de förespråkar för rättigheter för deras kön, ibland säga mindre än ansedda saker om det motsatta könet, gå in på hysteri när någon ifrågasätter vissa frågor, ta allt du säger av sammanhang och naturligtvis resultatet att namnge kräver ingen anledning alls (välFörutom inte överens med dem helt).

När frågan om en enkel fråga om "hur skulle känna tonåring manliga, raka sig?" som kan hända över denna sida var det träffade galla, ad hominem attacker och typiska feministiska leran smutskastning som vanligt. Det inte ta lång för mig att fånga vinden av vad som egentligen pågår. De var på defensiven utan anledning. De var över reagera på en enkel fråga "Hur är denna post relevanta för mäns rättigheter?" Det tar inte ett geni att inse att de som är över skyddsåtgärder av något som inte ens under attacken är i första hand.

Ärligt talat, hade jag fått ett enkelt svar "vi stödja homosexuella bokföring sinnliga artiklar om andra män" Jag skulle ha sagt "okej" och skulle ha avslutat stadium rätt. Men den reaktion som jag fått mig att tänka att jag skulle hålla mig genom lera smutskastning och det inte så mycket för mig att se vad de handlar alla om.

Det är inte första gången Pauls gruppen har kommit i fråga om dess integritet. På spjutspets fanns det rapporter om ras förtal, namnet calling och shaming taktik, etc (du vet, det hela feministiska som) och en mängd MRMs ge upp dem. De är också länkar till pro White nationalistiska webbplatser som http://www.inmalafide.com/ som också är anti-feminist eller pro MRA men ärligt talat, kan allvarligt kan du ta en grupp med vyer som? Tja, antar jag att mangina kan finns i många former och former. När jag säger mangina, i det här fallet menar jag behovet av att män som verkar vara så svaga att de behöver att gruppera upp på andra onödiga känslomässigt stöd. Precis som vad feminister gör. En sorglig dag det är.

En man kan debiteras för sexuella trakasserier för "leering" vid en kvinna på arbetsplatsen men en homosexuell man kan skriva sinnliga artiklar på en mäns rättigheter webbplats som UEFA champions "Män och pojkar" där varje pojke får surfar det är sidor söker svar, bara för att se något liknande. När jag frågade om en kommentar som han gjorde nämnde om "män är Välkommen här utan förbehåll" jag att det inte får kanske en bra idé eftersom det kan locka pedos eller medlemmar från NAMBLA klick, igen, konstruktiv kritik möttes med defensiva posering och galla.

Med detta sagt, har jag slutligen inser hur svårt det kan vara att många enskilda ytor och dimensioner av människor från olika bakgrund, övertygelse, sexuell läggning, etc. under samma tak. Paul, själv, gör mer än sin beskärda del med vad han gör och tar mycket av sin tid (och resurser från vad jag kan samla in) i detta projekt. Om han kan få sin over-reactive, hyper-defensiven lackeys att växa ett par och har sitt eget liv utan lever övervakningskommittén vad kan bara beskrivas som halthet posering som starka, manly, maskulinitet och sedan kanske fler män skulle se som en öppen, positiv kraft.

De flesta män (eller kvinnor som kanske vill hjälpa) kommer inte ansluter sig till en grupp av gnällspikar, liksom den feministiska trupp. Som med de flesta i min generation som motsätter sig ridiculousness som sipprar in våra önskade blanksteg för awesomeness säga, lycka"med som".

Su percepción es la realidad

Bastante fresco de Frickin (esto es un homosexual publicar material sensual de un supuesto sitio MRM una voz para los hombres)

De http://www.avoiceformen.com/2011/04/09/pretty-frickin-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-29462

por B.R. Merrick 4 de 9 de 2011.

' Me gusta caminar hacia abajo de la colina a la tienda quizás un par de veces a la semana. Vivo en un apartamento pero gran agradable complejo, un poco fuera de las boonies. Así que soy escuchar Prokofiev "noche de verano" Suite en mi iPod y zancadas el mini-mall, cuando oportunidad a un chico negro alto, hombros amplia, guapo, probablemente unos 10 años más joven que yo, camiseta negra aferrarse muscular y cortos de camuflaje, la mano del niño más lindo que has visto desde el este. Pequeña, pantalones de niño pequeño. Jeans con no atrás bolsillos. (Dónde impone su cartera niño?) Los vaqueros son tan holgados parece que no tiene ningún tope.

I pasado y visto y visto y visto con una gran sonrisa en mi cara.
Cuando fui a casa, estaban todavía en el camino delante de mí. Desesperadamente quería preguntarle si pude tomar una foto, lo que/lo/donde/cuando/por qué y cómo entrevista rápidamente. Quería compartir un poco más de lo que comparto. Pero me alegro de que decidió no hacerlo. Hay algo que decir de haiku, aunque suene más lamentable en inglés:

Un padre y su hijo
Caminando de la mano sin
Mi interferencia.

Por lo tanto, se abstengan de mencionar la pièce de résistance cuando sacó al niño de su lado por el torso y lo colocó sobre sus hombros.

B.R. Merrick escribe para "atacar la raíz" y "una voz para los hombres," vidas en el noreste, está orgulloso de ser un crítico de música clásica en Amazon.com y iTunes, y a pesar de la naturaleza tóxica de la televisión, Dios mismo tendrá que arrancar su DVD de "Monty Python Flying Circus" de su fría, manos de muertos, bajo la amenaza de la condenación eterna.»



Comentó en esta página y rápidamente se dio cuenta de este tipo puede ser verdaderamente para derechos de los hombres, pero este no es el tipo de público que la mayoría de hombres heterosexuales tomaría en serio. No tengo nada contra la multitud LGBT, pero ¿qué razón hay sería nada remotamente sensual en un sitio como éste? No hay ningún argumento convincente que soy consciente de confirmar su validez por lo que entendí como un macho 'movimiento feminista' que está centrada en el macho y saturación ideólogos homosexuales que, por supuesto, no importe mucho a largo plazo y probablemente causar más daño que bien a los heterosexuales que serían realmente estar buscando un apoyo Grupo de personas. ¿Suena familiar?

Honestamente no podía importa menos lo que alguien hace en su dormitorio. Pero ¿cómo podría alguien le serio cuando hay puestos que en su sitio? ¿Que haría un sitio que soporta [Escriba sexo] de derechos, habla el sexo opuesto (en algunos casos puede ser válido en función de la vista particular), a continuación, permite a esas mismas personas dentro del grupo a escribir artículos sexual y sensualized sobre ese mismo grupo de personas? Ah, las feministas. Sólo tiene sentido tanto. Introduzca el año de la feminazi masculino.

Por supuesto, no Concentrémonos en todas las cosas malas que va allí, ya cosas buenas tienen potencial para hacer de la tierra. Como feministas, que abogan por los derechos de su sexo, a veces decir menos confianza cosas sobre el sexo opuesto, vaya a histeria cuando alguien cuestiona determinados temas, todo lo que diga fuera de contexto y por supuesto resultado entre llamando por ningún motivo en absoluto (bien tomarAdemás de no acordar con ellos completamente).

Cuando se le preguntó a una simple cuestión de '¿cómo un adolescente masculino, recta sentiría?' que puede ocurrir a través de esta página se encontró con vitriolo, ataques ad hominem y el típico barro feminista insultos como de costumbre. No pasó mucho tiempo para mí atrapar viento de lo que realmente estaba pasando. Estaban a la defensiva por ningún motivo. Fueron en reacción a una simple pregunta "cómo es este post pertinentes a los derechos de los hombres?" No hace falta ser un genio para darse cuenta de que estaban siendo sobre protección de algo que no estaba aún bajo ataque en primer lugar.

Con toda honestidad, había recibido una respuesta simple 'apoyamos los homosexuales publicar artículos sensuales sobre otros hombres' habría dicho 'vale' y habría salido de derecho de la etapa. Pero la reacción que recibí me hizo pensar que duraría a través de la opción de barro y no tardó mucho para que pueda ver lo que están sobre.

Esto no es la primera vez que grupo de Paul ha entrado en la pregunta sobre su integridad. En la punta de lanza, hubo informes de ligaduras raciales, llamada nombre, denunciar las tácticas, etc. (saben, lo todo feminista) y un montón de MRMs renunciar a ellos. ¿Sus es también vínculos a sitios como http://www.inmalafide.com/ pro 'blanco nacionalista"que también son antifeminista o MRA pro pero honestamente, puede grave puede usted toma un grupo con vistas así? Bueno, supongo que mangina (mamona) puede venir en muchas formas y formas. Cuando digo mangina (mamona), en este caso, me refiero a la necesidad de hombres que parecen ser tan débil que necesitan para agrupar hasta otros de apoyo emocional innecesario. Al igual que lo hacen las feministas. Es un día triste.

Un hombre puede ser acusado por acoso sexual para 'ofendiendo' a una mujer en el lugar de trabajo pero un hombre homosexual puede escribir artículos sensuales en derechos sitio masculino que aboga por "Hombres y muchachos" donde puede navegar a cualquier niño sus páginas en busca de respuestas, sólo para ver algo así. Cuando le pregunté sobre un comentario que hizo diciendo 'hombres son bienvenidos aquí sin calificación' mencioné que tal vez no sea tan buena idea ya que puede atraer cuantos o miembros de la camarilla NAMBLA, una vez más, la crítica constructiva se encontró con la postura defensiva y saña.

Por último, con el dijo, cuenta lo difícil que puede ser que muchos rostros individuales y dimensiones de personas de diferentes orígenes, creencias, preferencias sexuales, etc. bajo un mismo techo. Pablo, en el mismo, se hace más que su reparto justo con lo que él hace y pone mucho de su tiempo (y recursos de lo que yo puedo reunir) en este proyecto. Si él puede obtener su over-reactive, hiper defensiva lackeys crecer un par y tener sus propias vidas sin subsidiariamente viviendo lo que sólo puede calificarse de cojera postura como masculinidad fuerte, varonil, entonces quizás más hombres vería el grupo como un abierto, fuerza positiva.

La mayoría de los hombres (o las mujeres que quieran ayudar a) no alineará con un grupo de whiners, como la tropa feminista. Como ocurre con la mayoría de la gente de mi generación que se oponen a la ridiculez filtrarse en nuestros espacios deseados de espectacular decir, 'buena suerte con '.

Misandry - Man Bashing & Heroic Men

Misandry - Man Bashing & Heroic Men

A Voice for Men (Men's Rights?)

Not long ago I posted about a certain MRA/MRM website that claims to represent Men and Boys rights titled Pretty Frickin cool (Or is it).  However, after looking over a lot of the very good material at the site, I happened upon a few posts that eroticized men there.

As soon as I discovered it, I simply asked out of curiousity about the material.  I thought, well, if it's a gay/homosexual website then so be it and I'll be on my merry little way.  However, after just asking about it's relevance in the site, I realized I was being attacked.  Naturally, this peaked my interest and curiousity which began to compel me to press on for further information.

During the wild barrage of insults I bared while in pursuit of my goal, I was told many things.  Some of it useful, most of it complete rubbish.  One of the things I was told (by Paul Elam himself for that matter) was that 'A Voice for Men accepts men here without qualification.'  Which, of course, made me exceptionally interested of what manner of culture was being shared in this environment.

Well, the gruesome details of that endeavor was pretty much covered in my last post but I've came across some statistics from the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), since 'A Voice for Men' is based in the United States.

And here we are:

http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/saycrle.pdf  Page 4 "the majority of victims of forcible sodomy (54%) were males" and "For victims under age 12, the male proportions were even greater: sexual assault with an object (19%), forcible fondling (26%), and forcible sodomy (64%)."

Of course, women do suffer the most of sexual assault but it's not an 'epidemic' as feminists try to make it out to be.  However, concerning the relatively small amount of sexual abuse little boys suffer, underage boys are suffering from sexual abuse from the homosexual community in a staggering amount in proportion to all sexual abuse for boys, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics.

I must then ask myself if the 'A Voice for Men' website really champion men and boys, and if they do, is it in a way that's appropriate.