Westernized Singapore has witnessed the gradual aggression of women towards men for some time now and people are starting to use technology to inform the international community.
Friday, January 13, 2012
Systemic Gendered Violence? (Youtube)
A woman not brainwashed by feminist cultural indoctrination:
The part she mentions about Egypt is very important and highlights how brainwashed Westernized society is so much more sensitive to issues involving women. It only took one woman for western media to stereotype a country as 'anti-woman.'
The part she mentions about Egypt is very important and highlights how brainwashed Westernized society is so much more sensitive to issues involving women. It only took one woman for western media to stereotype a country as 'anti-woman.'
Modern Women, Feminism and Re-Engineering Society (Youtube)
The global Elites use Feminism and the LGBT 2-4% of the world population to further divide the masses.
As stated in the video, no society would attempt turn men against women unless that society is sick. The LGBT communities will continue to cheer them on until they realize that they are no longer useful to the global elites as procedure with anyone else that loses value to them.
I'm not religious, I believe in fact and science so I don't pay attention to their religious commentary but I agree with most of what is being discussed here.
As stated in the video, no society would attempt turn men against women unless that society is sick. The LGBT communities will continue to cheer them on until they realize that they are no longer useful to the global elites as procedure with anyone else that loses value to them.
I'm not religious, I believe in fact and science so I don't pay attention to their religious commentary but I agree with most of what is being discussed here.
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Homosexual men preying on street children causing an epidemic in HIV/AIDs in Afghanistan
This shouldn't happen in any society....we're smart enough to know where this eventually leads. History proves this over and over again.
People of the world please open your eyes.
Risk of Contracting HIV/AIDS in Afghanistan
Notice during the video the emphasis of training mothers how to prevent them from spreading it to their children but do not mention any plan stop the main threat to these disenfranchised kids.
The international political correctness police score for the win.
People of the world please open your eyes.
Risk of Contracting HIV/AIDS in Afghanistan
Notice during the video the emphasis of training mothers how to prevent them from spreading it to their children but do not mention any plan stop the main threat to these disenfranchised kids.
The international political correctness police score for the win.
Saturday, December 31, 2011
Barbara Kay on institutionalized feminism and misandry (youtube)
Barbara kay on institutionalized feminism and misandry.
The Failure of Feminism by theamazingathiest (youtube)
This is one of the few gay guys that I actually can agree with and seems to know what he's talking about.
Eradicate Sex Work? (Youtube)
A good video by themessianicmanic on youtube.
'Our bodies, our choice, the government shouldn't tell women what they can or cannot do with their bodies' is what you'll hear from most Feminazis. However, that utterly cheery slogan is never uttered when it comes to sex work and many other topics affecting women (or men...remember that they are supposed to want equality for women and men...lol).
'Our bodies, our choice, the government shouldn't tell women what they can or cannot do with their bodies' is what you'll hear from most Feminazis. However, that utterly cheery slogan is never uttered when it comes to sex work and many other topics affecting women (or men...remember that they are supposed to want equality for women and men...lol).
Thursday, December 22, 2011
Single mom psychology, seeks the spousification of male sons
One of Barbarossaaaa's more watchable videos.
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
A good video about Ayn Rand Morons and Neo right wingers (America)
Mr1001nights makes another great video. Very interesting....it almost makes me wish I was American....almost.
I think it would be impossible to be an American and support either of their ridiculous parties. I think being an independent would be the way to go.
I think it would be impossible to be an American and support either of their ridiculous parties. I think being an independent would be the way to go.
Bank of America to pay $335 Million in settlement with US over Bias case
When looking from the outside of the US, it is still the place to look to for hope and promise of many people of the world. However, after reading this article I doubt that it's as much an open society as it claims to be.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755576/ns/business-us_business/
BofA in record settlement with US over bias case
The settlement covers conduct between 2004 and 2008 before the acquisition by Bank of America, and involves a range of alleged wrongdoing including charging African-Americans and Hispanics higher interest rates and fees and steering some to more expensive subprime mortgages.
"In today’s settlement with Countrywide Financial Corporation, we resolved the government’s allegations that Countrywide and its subsidiaries – which are now owned by Bank of America – engaged in discriminatory mortgage lending practices against more than 200,000 qualified African-American and Hispanic borrowers from 2004 through 2008," U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said in a statement.
Holder said that the investigation found a widespread pattern of discrimination in more than 180 geographic markets across 41 states and the District of Columbia.
"These allegations represent alarming conduct – by one of the largest mortgage lenders in this country, during the height of the housing market boom," he added.
The money will be used to compensate victims of Countrywide's discriminatory mortgage loans from 2004 through 2007.
Reuters and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755576/ns/business-us_business/
BofA in record settlement with US over bias case
$335 million settles charges that its Countrywide unit discriminated against minority homebuyers
NEW YORK — Bank of America Corp's Countrywide Financial unit agreed on Wednesday to pay a record $335 million to settle civil charges that it discriminated against minority homebuyers, a historic settlement for the Obama administration in the wake of the subprime mortgage morass.
As the financial crisis was building in 2008, Bank of America bought Countrywide, which specialized in so-called subprime mortgages, focusing on loans to those with lower credit ratings and charging them higher interest rates. The settlement covers conduct between 2004 and 2008 before the acquisition by Bank of America, and involves a range of alleged wrongdoing including charging African-Americans and Hispanics higher interest rates and fees and steering some to more expensive subprime mortgages.
"In today’s settlement with Countrywide Financial Corporation, we resolved the government’s allegations that Countrywide and its subsidiaries – which are now owned by Bank of America – engaged in discriminatory mortgage lending practices against more than 200,000 qualified African-American and Hispanic borrowers from 2004 through 2008," U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said in a statement.
Holder said that the investigation found a widespread pattern of discrimination in more than 180 geographic markets across 41 states and the District of Columbia.
"These allegations represent alarming conduct – by one of the largest mortgage lenders in this country, during the height of the housing market boom," he added.
The money will be used to compensate victims of Countrywide's discriminatory mortgage loans from 2004 through 2007.
Reuters and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Friday, December 16, 2011
Saturday, December 10, 2011
Friday, December 9, 2011
Male on Male Sexual Harassment on the Rise
To those that support the inclusion of 'open homosexuality' because it somehow benefits society:
(United States)
Posted http://www.claimsjournal.com/news/national/2010/03/08/107913.htm on March 8, 2010
'
John Pilkington’s boss wouldn’t take no for an answer.
During more than two years as a food runner at an upscale steakhouse in Scottsdale, Arizona, Pilkington says his male supervisor groped, fondled and otherwise sexually harassed him more than a dozen times.
“It was very embarrassing,” Pilkington said. “I felt like I had to do something because the situation was just so bad.”
Now Pilkington, a married father of two, is the star witness in a U.S. federal lawsuit against Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar and one of a growing number of American men claiming they are victims of sexual harassment in the workplace.
From 1990 to 2009, the percentage of sexual harassment claims filed by men has doubled from 8 percent to 16 percent, according to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Lawyers at the commission say they’ve noticed the increase in complaints by men — more than 2,000 were filed in 2009 out of about 12,700 cases.
“It’s certainly possible that there’s more sexual harassment of men going on, but it could just be that more men are coming forward and complaining about it,” said Ernest Haffner, an attorney in the commission’s Office of Legal Counsel.
While some cases allege harassment by female supervisors or co-workers, most charges involve men harassing other men. Sometimes it’s unwelcome romantic advances. Other times, men are picked on because they are gay, perceived as being gay or not considered masculine enough for the work setting.
In the past, some employers might have shrugged off such antics as “boys will be boys” horseplay or fraternity-type behavior. But the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has been filing more lawsuits involving male victims, saying it wants to send a message that such behavior is unacceptable and unlawful.
In November, for example, the Cheesecake Factory restaurant chain agreed to pay $345,000 to six male employees who claimed they were repeatedly sexually assaulted by a group of male kitchen staffers at a Phoenix-area restaurant.
The commission said the abusers would drag some victims kicking and screaming into a walk-in refrigerator, touching and grinding against the victims’ genitals and take turns simulating rape. The company denied the allegations but agreed to make a financial settlement and educate its employees and managers about sexual harassment.
Susan Strauss, a consultant who advises companies about how to avoid sexual harassment in the workplace, said she’s seeing more cases in which men are subject to a sexualized form of hazing.
“If you don’t fit the masculine stereotype or are viewed as effeminate, you get picked on in a sexual way to demean you,” Strauss said.
Cases involving women making unwanted advances toward men may also be rising as women make up a growing part of the work force. Last year, the Regal Entertainment Group, which operates a national chain of movie theaters, agreed to pay $175,000 to settle a lawsuit by a male employee who claimed a female co-worker repeatedly grabbed his crotch at work.
When the employee complained to his supervisor and the theater’s then-general manager, he claims, she failed to stop the harassment and instead retaliated with unfair discipline and lower performance evaluations.
The number of cases filed by men has grown steadily since a landmark Supreme Court ruling in 1998 held that same-sex harassment is a valid claim under federal anti-discrimination laws. That ruling involved an offshore oil rig worker who said he was subject to humiliating sex-related treatment by other workers, including being sodomized in the shower with a bar of soap.
In Pilkington’s case, he claims the restaurant’s chef would grope and pinch his genitals or grab his backside when Pilkington walked to the kitchen or stock room. Despite his complaints to the restaurant’s operating partner, he says the conduct didn’t stop.
After one incident, Pilkington lost his composure and yelled at the chef. Days later, he was fired — an action he claims was retaliation for his complaints. An Equal Employment Opportunity Commission lawsuit on behalf of Pilkington and three other current and former employees is pending.
“I think maybe it’s just harder for males to come out and file a complaint because of how embarrassing it is,” Pilkington said. “When I talk about it I get this nauseous feeling in my stomach.”
The restaurant has denied the charges. In a statement, the company that owns Fleming’s said the restaurant “has always been committed to providing a safe and healthy workplace free of harassment for all of its associates.”
Many victims are hesitant to come forward because they are afraid of being considered unmanly or being derided by co-workers, said Mary Jo O’Neill, a regional attorney in the EEOC’s Phoenix District office.
“All sexual harassment victims feel humiliated, lacking control and power,” O’Neill said. “This has a different twist because everyone expects that they would be able to handle it and take care of it themselves.” '
(United States)
Posted http://www.claimsjournal.com/news/national/2010/03/08/107913.htm on March 8, 2010
'
John Pilkington’s boss wouldn’t take no for an answer.
During more than two years as a food runner at an upscale steakhouse in Scottsdale, Arizona, Pilkington says his male supervisor groped, fondled and otherwise sexually harassed him more than a dozen times.
“It was very embarrassing,” Pilkington said. “I felt like I had to do something because the situation was just so bad.”
Now Pilkington, a married father of two, is the star witness in a U.S. federal lawsuit against Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar and one of a growing number of American men claiming they are victims of sexual harassment in the workplace.
From 1990 to 2009, the percentage of sexual harassment claims filed by men has doubled from 8 percent to 16 percent, according to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Lawyers at the commission say they’ve noticed the increase in complaints by men — more than 2,000 were filed in 2009 out of about 12,700 cases.
“It’s certainly possible that there’s more sexual harassment of men going on, but it could just be that more men are coming forward and complaining about it,” said Ernest Haffner, an attorney in the commission’s Office of Legal Counsel.
While some cases allege harassment by female supervisors or co-workers, most charges involve men harassing other men. Sometimes it’s unwelcome romantic advances. Other times, men are picked on because they are gay, perceived as being gay or not considered masculine enough for the work setting.
In the past, some employers might have shrugged off such antics as “boys will be boys” horseplay or fraternity-type behavior. But the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has been filing more lawsuits involving male victims, saying it wants to send a message that such behavior is unacceptable and unlawful.
In November, for example, the Cheesecake Factory restaurant chain agreed to pay $345,000 to six male employees who claimed they were repeatedly sexually assaulted by a group of male kitchen staffers at a Phoenix-area restaurant.
The commission said the abusers would drag some victims kicking and screaming into a walk-in refrigerator, touching and grinding against the victims’ genitals and take turns simulating rape. The company denied the allegations but agreed to make a financial settlement and educate its employees and managers about sexual harassment.
Susan Strauss, a consultant who advises companies about how to avoid sexual harassment in the workplace, said she’s seeing more cases in which men are subject to a sexualized form of hazing.
“If you don’t fit the masculine stereotype or are viewed as effeminate, you get picked on in a sexual way to demean you,” Strauss said.
Cases involving women making unwanted advances toward men may also be rising as women make up a growing part of the work force. Last year, the Regal Entertainment Group, which operates a national chain of movie theaters, agreed to pay $175,000 to settle a lawsuit by a male employee who claimed a female co-worker repeatedly grabbed his crotch at work.
When the employee complained to his supervisor and the theater’s then-general manager, he claims, she failed to stop the harassment and instead retaliated with unfair discipline and lower performance evaluations.
The number of cases filed by men has grown steadily since a landmark Supreme Court ruling in 1998 held that same-sex harassment is a valid claim under federal anti-discrimination laws. That ruling involved an offshore oil rig worker who said he was subject to humiliating sex-related treatment by other workers, including being sodomized in the shower with a bar of soap.
In Pilkington’s case, he claims the restaurant’s chef would grope and pinch his genitals or grab his backside when Pilkington walked to the kitchen or stock room. Despite his complaints to the restaurant’s operating partner, he says the conduct didn’t stop.
After one incident, Pilkington lost his composure and yelled at the chef. Days later, he was fired — an action he claims was retaliation for his complaints. An Equal Employment Opportunity Commission lawsuit on behalf of Pilkington and three other current and former employees is pending.
“I think maybe it’s just harder for males to come out and file a complaint because of how embarrassing it is,” Pilkington said. “When I talk about it I get this nauseous feeling in my stomach.”
The restaurant has denied the charges. In a statement, the company that owns Fleming’s said the restaurant “has always been committed to providing a safe and healthy workplace free of harassment for all of its associates.”
Many victims are hesitant to come forward because they are afraid of being considered unmanly or being derided by co-workers, said Mary Jo O’Neill, a regional attorney in the EEOC’s Phoenix District office.
“All sexual harassment victims feel humiliated, lacking control and power,” O’Neill said. “This has a different twist because everyone expects that they would be able to handle it and take care of it themselves.” '
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Flight from marriage and foreign brides
A most interesting but equally ridiculous article I found.
http://sc2220.wetpaint.com/page/Flight+from+marriage+and+foreign+brides
'In this Lecture, the flight from marriage amongst the younger generation of Singaporeans was highlighted. The issue of education homogomy indeed plays an important part in this problem as more educated women in Singapore have found it harder to find a husband of equal or higher educational and social status as them. Extracted from the Get Real Series, men deemed Singaporean women as harder to love because they may come across as “arrogant”, especially for those who pursued a higher education. In my opinion, the fact that women may not necessarily want a man who is less accomplished as her does not equate to arrogance. In fact it may just be a reflection of the growing emancipation of women’s rights, and the fact that more women have come to realize that they are able, and have an equal right to that of men, to attain what they truly want. Men may see this emerging trait amongst women as a sign of increasing materialistic values and demands, as they have not changed their mindset, from that of a patriarchal school of thought to one which holds an egalitarian point of view of society. Furthermore in terms of educational homogamy, Nock mentions in his article on mate selection that, “those who have completed comparable amounts of schooling exhibit similar values, attitudes and lifestyles”. (Nock, 1992) With that concept in mind, it might be hard for a man of lower educational status to “connect” with a woman who is more successful.
This lack of a change in their way of thinking has thus lead to an increase amongst many poorly educated Singaporean men to turn to a foreign bride resulting in “transnational patriarchy”. They are choosing to marry “foreign mail order brides” as they are deemed to be more conservative and would fulfill the ideal role of a spouse as seen by men ( Jones and Gubhaju, 2009). It could be said that men’s symbolic identity is threatened as they may no longer hold the breadwinner status when involved in a dual-income relationship. Hence, by resorting to marrying these “foreign mail-order brides” it may be an affirmation of their masculinity. Thus for men who have set their ideals based on traditional gender roles,such as that the wife should be only concerned with the household and taking care of their children, they will indeed be lacking in choice of spouses in the domestic marriage market.
In a recent article in The Straits Times, entitled “Bride and Gloom”, the struggles faced by these foreign brides in Singapore were emphasized, as seen in this statement; “These men take their wives as 'maids-***-sex partners-***-caregivers for their elderly parents”. Singaporean men who marry foreign brides, a large number of whom do not have a steady income and sometimes are unable to support themselves, often do so, so as to gain companionship and also to exploit them. It was also highlighted that as many of these brides are on a long-term visit pass, they fear being deported back and being separated from their children, should their husbands cancel their passes. In the lecture, we were asked to question whether Singapore is in fact a matriarchal society, due to the large number of laws that support women’s rights and creates a “protected class”. However, I do not feel that we are. Though Singaporean women are protected by the women’s Charter etc., in the case of foreign brides we see a clear disjuncture in that, they are not protected at all. Their rights seem to be considered to be negligible compared to that of their husbands. If Singapore was truly a matriarchal society, a safety net would be set in place to prevent such brides from being exploited by local Singaporean men. Hence, I feel that more can be done by the state to help protect these women, who are not ‘’gold-diggers” but rather come to Singapore in hopes of a better life so as to create not a matriarchal, but rather egalitarian society where both the concerns of men and women are considered.'
Now since this person has established the extent of their insanity, I wonder if they'll get arrested.
http://sc2220.wetpaint.com/page/Flight+from+marriage+and+foreign+brides
'In this Lecture, the flight from marriage amongst the younger generation of Singaporeans was highlighted. The issue of education homogomy indeed plays an important part in this problem as more educated women in Singapore have found it harder to find a husband of equal or higher educational and social status as them. Extracted from the Get Real Series, men deemed Singaporean women as harder to love because they may come across as “arrogant”, especially for those who pursued a higher education. In my opinion, the fact that women may not necessarily want a man who is less accomplished as her does not equate to arrogance. In fact it may just be a reflection of the growing emancipation of women’s rights, and the fact that more women have come to realize that they are able, and have an equal right to that of men, to attain what they truly want. Men may see this emerging trait amongst women as a sign of increasing materialistic values and demands, as they have not changed their mindset, from that of a patriarchal school of thought to one which holds an egalitarian point of view of society. Furthermore in terms of educational homogamy, Nock mentions in his article on mate selection that, “those who have completed comparable amounts of schooling exhibit similar values, attitudes and lifestyles”. (Nock, 1992) With that concept in mind, it might be hard for a man of lower educational status to “connect” with a woman who is more successful.
This lack of a change in their way of thinking has thus lead to an increase amongst many poorly educated Singaporean men to turn to a foreign bride resulting in “transnational patriarchy”. They are choosing to marry “foreign mail order brides” as they are deemed to be more conservative and would fulfill the ideal role of a spouse as seen by men ( Jones and Gubhaju, 2009). It could be said that men’s symbolic identity is threatened as they may no longer hold the breadwinner status when involved in a dual-income relationship. Hence, by resorting to marrying these “foreign mail-order brides” it may be an affirmation of their masculinity. Thus for men who have set their ideals based on traditional gender roles,such as that the wife should be only concerned with the household and taking care of their children, they will indeed be lacking in choice of spouses in the domestic marriage market.
In a recent article in The Straits Times, entitled “Bride and Gloom”, the struggles faced by these foreign brides in Singapore were emphasized, as seen in this statement; “These men take their wives as 'maids-***-sex partners-***-caregivers for their elderly parents”. Singaporean men who marry foreign brides, a large number of whom do not have a steady income and sometimes are unable to support themselves, often do so, so as to gain companionship and also to exploit them. It was also highlighted that as many of these brides are on a long-term visit pass, they fear being deported back and being separated from their children, should their husbands cancel their passes. In the lecture, we were asked to question whether Singapore is in fact a matriarchal society, due to the large number of laws that support women’s rights and creates a “protected class”. However, I do not feel that we are. Though Singaporean women are protected by the women’s Charter etc., in the case of foreign brides we see a clear disjuncture in that, they are not protected at all. Their rights seem to be considered to be negligible compared to that of their husbands. If Singapore was truly a matriarchal society, a safety net would be set in place to prevent such brides from being exploited by local Singaporean men. Hence, I feel that more can be done by the state to help protect these women, who are not ‘’gold-diggers” but rather come to Singapore in hopes of a better life so as to create not a matriarchal, but rather egalitarian society where both the concerns of men and women are considered.'
Now since this person has established the extent of their insanity, I wonder if they'll get arrested.
Friday, December 2, 2011
The War against boys (Youtube)
Christina Hoff Sommers discusses a topic that I think is one of the central problems in our modern society. She's a feminist but she's one that I don't mind listening to when it comes to this subject.
Thursday, December 1, 2011
Men and Feminism (Youtube)
And these folks wonder why men are unable to relate to these people..... (warning: this video can be painfully feminized and even more painfully ridiculous.
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Censorship in Feminist Media online (Youtube)
Another woman that is able to see through feminist propaganda.
Feminism mandated by the American government and United Nations Treaties (Westernized countries must obey)
If anyone ever had any doubts, this is the main source of legislation that has neutered the modern societies of the world at large.
Of course the other 'rights' groups involved won't acknowlege this but the leaders of their groups have used their clout to help legislation like this to get passed and wreck havoc on the general population (ie. the heterosexual majority of the world) to push their depopulation agenda which is counterintuitive to their actual goals since less humans == much less of their own population.
I've known for quite some time that theses other groups were being used to push this agenda but I'm glad that the internet is now allowing me to dig this wonderful information from the catacombs of history.
Of course the other 'rights' groups involved won't acknowlege this but the leaders of their groups have used their clout to help legislation like this to get passed and wreck havoc on the general population (ie. the heterosexual majority of the world) to push their depopulation agenda which is counterintuitive to their actual goals since less humans == much less of their own population.
I've known for quite some time that theses other groups were being used to push this agenda but I'm glad that the internet is now allowing me to dig this wonderful information from the catacombs of history.
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Richard Dawkins exposes the female privilege of ignoring the fear men have to live with
This is a very good video! I agree with mr1001nights' video for everything except for remarks about what people in America call 'game.'
A wonderful little insightful webpage I found...
While surfing the web today, I happened upon this wonderful webpage:
http://adonismirror.com/10152006_leader_misandry_and_misanthropy.htm
What I really found funny was the 'definition' of misandry at the bottom of the webpage:
'
Misandry:
mi•sand•ry n. A love for honest speech; accordance with reality: “Besides preaching misandry, the basic premise of women’s lib is that women are more discriminated against than men. That is the biggest hoax in the Western world” (Richard F. Doyle of the Christian Party). [A parallel construction of English misogyny, by American antifeminists in the late 20th century.] '
I think I'll post my new definition of insanity.
In*san*ity n. 1) A feminist that dismisses violence perpetrated by women to all other human beings, whether it is sexual, physical, phsycological, or verbal while claiming to be a feminist. 2) Feminists that believe and condone LGBT separatist Lesbian Feminism is a rational, alternative lifestyle. 3) Feminists that believe children are just a 'byproduct' or just has 'a special relationship with' heterosexual couples. 4) Anyone that believes that gender is just a social construct. 5) Anyone that believes that men and women are the same. 6) Anyone that agrees with these types of Feminists.
There are so many pieces of the body of that horrid post I could tear to shreds but today I'd rather finish my work and go home to enjoy my hobbies.
http://adonismirror.com/10152006_leader_misandry_and_misanthropy.htm
What I really found funny was the 'definition' of misandry at the bottom of the webpage:
'
Misandry:
mi•sand•ry n. A love for honest speech; accordance with reality: “Besides preaching misandry, the basic premise of women’s lib is that women are more discriminated against than men. That is the biggest hoax in the Western world” (Richard F. Doyle of the Christian Party). [A parallel construction of English misogyny, by American antifeminists in the late 20th century.] '
I think I'll post my new definition of insanity.
In*san*ity n. 1) A feminist that dismisses violence perpetrated by women to all other human beings, whether it is sexual, physical, phsycological, or verbal while claiming to be a feminist. 2) Feminists that believe and condone LGBT separatist Lesbian Feminism is a rational, alternative lifestyle. 3) Feminists that believe children are just a 'byproduct' or just has 'a special relationship with' heterosexual couples. 4) Anyone that believes that gender is just a social construct. 5) Anyone that believes that men and women are the same. 6) Anyone that agrees with these types of Feminists.
There are so many pieces of the body of that horrid post I could tear to shreds but today I'd rather finish my work and go home to enjoy my hobbies.
Monday, November 14, 2011
Thursday, November 10, 2011
Killing of Oxnard boy due to Neo-Nazi gay panic? No. It was in response to being sexually harassed.
Gotta love the mainstream media! This ridiculous article is pure propaganda.
http://www.examiner.com/international-lgbt-issues-in-national/killing-of-oxnard-boy-due-to-neo-nazi-gay-panic
by Kelvin Lynch, July 22, 2009
'
Lawrence King, the Oxnard boy slain last year at the age of 15 while at school, was portrayed as a "gay bully" by defense attorneys for his classmate and killer, Brandon McInerney.
In a pre-trial hearing, McInerney's lawyers said King would lash out verbally and chase boys who picked on him for wearing makeup, nail polish and high heels, according to the LA times.
Prosecutor Maeve Fox asked, "Is the defense 'gay panic'? This is just a fishing expedition to paint Larry King as someone who needed killing."
Fox presented an expert witness who testified that McInerney was acquainted with local neo-Nazis and kept a notebook with elaborate drawings of Nazi symbols and regalia.
Dan Swanson, a Simi Valley police detective and specialist in neo-Nazi gangs, said the evidence strongly indicated McInerney had been indoctrinated to some level.
Indeed, a search of McIneney's bedroom and backpack yielded the notebook, seven of Hitler's speeches translated into English and a book about SS troopers who had been former members of the Hitler Youth. Swanson said the collection reflected an interest in the Nazis that was far more profound than a World War II book report McInerney had been assigned.
Swanson discounted earlier testimony that McInerney had black and Latino friends at school, saying it was a commong tactic of white supremacists, who are accustomed to hiding their true beliefs. Swanson said the teenager's family was friendly with a white supremacist in the Oxnard area. The man told Swanson that he and his girlfriend allowed McInerney to sleep in their apartment a night or two before the shooting.
Teachers and students said King and McInerney had traded taunts and gotten into a shoving match in the weeks leading up to the murder. McInerney's attorneys said King harrassed their client by publicly declaring his love for him, and other boys complained that he would blow them kisses. A substitute teacher told investigators that King put his hands down his pants and wiped them off on her and other students, although her account was disputed by prosecutors.
"He was harassing other students," said Scott Wippert, an attorney for McInerney. "There was a climate of harassment at school that surrounded not only Larry but also Brandon."
King's murder shocked the country in February 2008. McInerney walked into a computer classroom and shot King in cold blood. McInerney was charged as an adult with premeditated murder, with enhancements of discharge of a firearm and a hate crime. He faces a sentence of 50 years to life in prison if convicted.
Both boys came from broken homes. At the time of the shooting, King was living in a group home after being removed from his foster parents' custody, following King's allegations that his father was physically abusing him. King's biological father abandoned him and his drug-addicted mother. McInerney's parents have a long history of domestic violence, apparently related to his mother's addiction to methamphetamine.
'
The gay community knows that this is the typical reaction of straight boys when encountering homosexuals and I think they are going to realize the hard way why most straight men the world over respond this way to those types of advances. No amount of media propaganda is going to change the natural defense mechanisms of the human species. Social Engineering experiments just create more problems for society.
http://www.examiner.com/international-lgbt-issues-in-national/killing-of-oxnard-boy-due-to-neo-nazi-gay-panic
by Kelvin Lynch, July 22, 2009
'
Lawrence King, the Oxnard boy slain last year at the age of 15 while at school, was portrayed as a "gay bully" by defense attorneys for his classmate and killer, Brandon McInerney.
In a pre-trial hearing, McInerney's lawyers said King would lash out verbally and chase boys who picked on him for wearing makeup, nail polish and high heels, according to the LA times.
Prosecutor Maeve Fox asked, "Is the defense 'gay panic'? This is just a fishing expedition to paint Larry King as someone who needed killing."
Fox presented an expert witness who testified that McInerney was acquainted with local neo-Nazis and kept a notebook with elaborate drawings of Nazi symbols and regalia.
Dan Swanson, a Simi Valley police detective and specialist in neo-Nazi gangs, said the evidence strongly indicated McInerney had been indoctrinated to some level.
Indeed, a search of McIneney's bedroom and backpack yielded the notebook, seven of Hitler's speeches translated into English and a book about SS troopers who had been former members of the Hitler Youth. Swanson said the collection reflected an interest in the Nazis that was far more profound than a World War II book report McInerney had been assigned.
Swanson discounted earlier testimony that McInerney had black and Latino friends at school, saying it was a commong tactic of white supremacists, who are accustomed to hiding their true beliefs. Swanson said the teenager's family was friendly with a white supremacist in the Oxnard area. The man told Swanson that he and his girlfriend allowed McInerney to sleep in their apartment a night or two before the shooting.
Teachers and students said King and McInerney had traded taunts and gotten into a shoving match in the weeks leading up to the murder. McInerney's attorneys said King harrassed their client by publicly declaring his love for him, and other boys complained that he would blow them kisses. A substitute teacher told investigators that King put his hands down his pants and wiped them off on her and other students, although her account was disputed by prosecutors.
"He was harassing other students," said Scott Wippert, an attorney for McInerney. "There was a climate of harassment at school that surrounded not only Larry but also Brandon."
King's murder shocked the country in February 2008. McInerney walked into a computer classroom and shot King in cold blood. McInerney was charged as an adult with premeditated murder, with enhancements of discharge of a firearm and a hate crime. He faces a sentence of 50 years to life in prison if convicted.
Both boys came from broken homes. At the time of the shooting, King was living in a group home after being removed from his foster parents' custody, following King's allegations that his father was physically abusing him. King's biological father abandoned him and his drug-addicted mother. McInerney's parents have a long history of domestic violence, apparently related to his mother's addiction to methamphetamine.
'
The gay community knows that this is the typical reaction of straight boys when encountering homosexuals and I think they are going to realize the hard way why most straight men the world over respond this way to those types of advances. No amount of media propaganda is going to change the natural defense mechanisms of the human species. Social Engineering experiments just create more problems for society.
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Female Pedophilia/Pederasty is shown in a 'romantic' setting
Female pedophilia/pederasty being viewed as 'romantic'. Completely ridiculous.
Boy forced to pay child support to his Female pedo-rapist
Here is the link to the story: http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2008/08/16/janecrane.ART_ART_08-16-08_B1_T0B1RSR.html
by Mary Beth Lane, The Columbus Dispatch,
Here is what is in the story.
'
LANCASTER, Ohio --- A Pickerington couple and their son are fighting for custody of a baby born to a Lancaster woman charged with having unlawful sex with the boy, who was 15 at the time of conception.
A paternity test shows that the teen is the father of the baby born April 7 to Jane C. Crane, who was 19 when she became pregnant. Now, a judge has ordered him to pay $50 a month in child support and set visitation at seven hours a week.
Crane, meanwhile, faces criminal charges. A Fairfield County grand jury indicted her last month on two counts of unlawful sexual conduct with a minor, a fourth-degree felony. Conviction carries a maximum sentence of 18 months in prison and a requirement to register as a sex offender for 25 years.
Crane is living with the baby and her family in Lancaster.
The boy's parents say they can provide a better upbringing for the baby than Crane can. Her household includes her stepfather, David L. Jacobs, who was convicted of domestic violence last year for hitting, choking and pointing a gun at Crane's 17-year-old sister and was placed on two years' probation, court records show.
"We don't want to have our granddaughter abused by these people," the boy's father said. "We are trying to do the right thing.
"The child support was the icing on the cake. I couldn't believe that our son has to pay child support to his abuser."
The Dispatch does not identify victims of sexual abuse.
Crane is scheduled for a pretrial conference before Common Pleas Judge Richard E. Berens on Aug. 21. A hearing and a status conference in the custody dispute are scheduled for next month before Domestic Relations Judge Kathy S. Mowry.
Crane, now 21, is not a suitable custodial parent in part because she may have committed a felony by having sexual intercourse with a minor younger than 16, the boy's parents argue in court papers seeking custody.
Crane declined to comment. She is free on a $5,000 recognizance bond pending trial. Her attorney, Sandra Davis, did not return calls. Lawyer Jennifer Strunk, the court-appointed guardian ad litem representing the baby's interests, said through a spokesman that she could not comment.
That a 19-year-old woman had sex with a 15-year-old boy might seem like no big deal to some, but it is a serious charge, said Assistant Prosecutor Julia Dillon.
It makes no difference that it is an adult female charged with unlawful sexual conduct with a minor boy rather than the more common instance of an adult male charged with unlawful sexual conduct with a minor girl.
"It is an age and maturity issue, not a gender issue," Dillon said. "He's a young boy coming into his own, being taken advantage of by an adult."
There could yet be a plea agreement. "I have made what I consider to be a reasonable offer, but I have not received a response," she said.
The incident has had lasting affects on the boy, now 16, his mother said.
"He has nightmares, he is stressed out," she said. "He is a father, even though it was a crime for him to be a father. His life is changed forever."
Crane got to know the family while she worked at a local movie theater with the boy's older sister. When Crane said that her stepfather was abusive, his family allowed her to move in with them.
The boy's sister later bought her own home and Crane moved in with her. It was there last summer that Crane had sex with their son at least twice, his parents said.
mlane@dispatch.com '
If this isn't sexism, then I don't know what is.
by Mary Beth Lane, The Columbus Dispatch,
Here is what is in the story.
'
LANCASTER, Ohio --- A Pickerington couple and their son are fighting for custody of a baby born to a Lancaster woman charged with having unlawful sex with the boy, who was 15 at the time of conception.
A paternity test shows that the teen is the father of the baby born April 7 to Jane C. Crane, who was 19 when she became pregnant. Now, a judge has ordered him to pay $50 a month in child support and set visitation at seven hours a week.
Crane, meanwhile, faces criminal charges. A Fairfield County grand jury indicted her last month on two counts of unlawful sexual conduct with a minor, a fourth-degree felony. Conviction carries a maximum sentence of 18 months in prison and a requirement to register as a sex offender for 25 years.
Crane is living with the baby and her family in Lancaster.
The boy's parents say they can provide a better upbringing for the baby than Crane can. Her household includes her stepfather, David L. Jacobs, who was convicted of domestic violence last year for hitting, choking and pointing a gun at Crane's 17-year-old sister and was placed on two years' probation, court records show.
"We don't want to have our granddaughter abused by these people," the boy's father said. "We are trying to do the right thing.
"The child support was the icing on the cake. I couldn't believe that our son has to pay child support to his abuser."
The Dispatch does not identify victims of sexual abuse.
Crane is scheduled for a pretrial conference before Common Pleas Judge Richard E. Berens on Aug. 21. A hearing and a status conference in the custody dispute are scheduled for next month before Domestic Relations Judge Kathy S. Mowry.
Crane, now 21, is not a suitable custodial parent in part because she may have committed a felony by having sexual intercourse with a minor younger than 16, the boy's parents argue in court papers seeking custody.
Crane declined to comment. She is free on a $5,000 recognizance bond pending trial. Her attorney, Sandra Davis, did not return calls. Lawyer Jennifer Strunk, the court-appointed guardian ad litem representing the baby's interests, said through a spokesman that she could not comment.
That a 19-year-old woman had sex with a 15-year-old boy might seem like no big deal to some, but it is a serious charge, said Assistant Prosecutor Julia Dillon.
It makes no difference that it is an adult female charged with unlawful sexual conduct with a minor boy rather than the more common instance of an adult male charged with unlawful sexual conduct with a minor girl.
"It is an age and maturity issue, not a gender issue," Dillon said. "He's a young boy coming into his own, being taken advantage of by an adult."
There could yet be a plea agreement. "I have made what I consider to be a reasonable offer, but I have not received a response," she said.
The incident has had lasting affects on the boy, now 16, his mother said.
"He has nightmares, he is stressed out," she said. "He is a father, even though it was a crime for him to be a father. His life is changed forever."
Crane got to know the family while she worked at a local movie theater with the boy's older sister. When Crane said that her stepfather was abusive, his family allowed her to move in with them.
The boy's sister later bought her own home and Crane moved in with her. It was there last summer that Crane had sex with their son at least twice, his parents said.
mlane@dispatch.com '
If this isn't sexism, then I don't know what is.
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
How age of consent laws furthers misandry
A mentally retarded man charged for statutory rape......even though the minor deceived him.
Monday, November 7, 2011
Occupy Wall Street - Chris Hedges & Cornell West
This video will help illuminate the corruption from the neo liberals and neo conservatives in the United States. Unfortunately the rest of the world is tied to their economy.
If you live in the USA it would probably be best to be a registered Independent voter and vote out all encumbants in order to get the laws working as they should again.
If you live in the USA it would probably be best to be a registered Independent voter and vote out all encumbants in order to get the laws working as they should again.
Friday, November 4, 2011
Thio Li Ann on 377a in Singaporean Parliament
Stand up for what you believe is right Thio Li Ann! We all know where society goes from this point on if the repeal of 377a happens!
If you notice....part 2 is missing. At the end of part 1 Thio Li Ann began talking about pedophelia and pederasty that some homo groups are trying to push legally. I'm sure it was removed due to 'violating guidelines' of some sort.
Part 3 is very honest and should be shown the world over.
If you notice....part 2 is missing. At the end of part 1 Thio Li Ann began talking about pedophelia and pederasty that some homo groups are trying to push legally. I'm sure it was removed due to 'violating guidelines' of some sort.
Part 3 is very honest and should be shown the world over.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)